Does π0.5 run on Mobile ALOHA?

board: NVIDIA RTX 4090 · ggml_cuda_f16_f32_out: 0 (README preset for RTX 4090)

Inference cost only; not task success. Full VLM + action-expert pass (ViT + LLM + 10-step action expert), LIBERO inputs (agent-view + wrist at 224x224). From the EagleVLA-Edge README RTX 4090 table (P50), PR #6 configuration. The README's naive π0.5 baseline on this GPU: 162.9 ms (not filed as a separate run: the baseline precision is not stated).

board: NVIDIA RTX 4090 · ggml_cuda_f16_f32_out: 0 (README preset for RTX 4090)

Inference cost only; not task success. Full VLM + action-expert pass (ViT + LLM + 10-step action expert), LIBERO inputs (agent-view + wrist at 224x224). From the EagleVLA-Edge README RTX 4090 table (P50). The README's naive π0.5 baseline on this GPU: 162.9 ms (not filed as a separate run: the baseline precision is not stated).

board: Jetson Thor (paper/README: "Jetson Thor")

Inference cost only; not task success. Full VLM + action-expert pass (ViT + LLM + 10-step action expert), LIBERO inputs (agent-view + wrist at 224x224). Later configuration from the EagleVLA-Edge README (PR #6); the README notes an accuracy caveat for the two-switch GEMM preset on Thor. Naive PyTorch π0.5 on the same board per the paper: 457.9 ms (2.18 Hz) (not filed as a separate run: the baseline precision is not stated).

board: Jetson Thor (paper/README: "Jetson Thor")

Inference cost only; not task success. Full VLM + action-expert pass (ViT + LLM + 10-step action expert), LIBERO inputs (agent-view + wrist at 224x224). Paper's 'control frequency' (10.25 Hz) is 1/reaction time with VLM-skipping scheduling; not executed actions/s. Board inferred to be the 128 GB T5000 class from the paper's 130 W max-power entry for Thor (T4000 is 40–70 W). Naive PyTorch π0.5 on the same board per the paper: 457.9 ms (2.18 Hz) (not filed as a separate run: the baseline precision is not stated).

board: Jetson Orin, 'Orin-50W' power mode (AGX Orin 64GB inferred, see ev-orin-board-inferred)

Inference cost only; not task success. Full VLM + action-expert pass (ViT + LLM + 10-step action expert), LIBERO inputs (agent-view + wrist at 224x224). Later configuration from the EagleVLA-Edge README (time cache + cuBLASLt GEMM tuning, PR #6); not in the paper. Naive PyTorch π0.5 on the same board per the paper: 1420.8 ms (0.70 Hz) (not filed as a separate run: the baseline precision is not stated).

board: Jetson Orin, 'Orin-50W' power mode (AGX Orin 64GB inferred, see ev-orin-board-inferred)

Inference cost only; not task success. Full VLM + action-expert pass (ViT + LLM + 10-step action expert), LIBERO inputs (agent-view + wrist at 224x224). Paper's 'control frequency' (6.93 Hz) is 1/reaction time with confidence-based scheduling that skips the VLM; it is not executed actions/s and is not recorded as control_rate_hz. Naive PyTorch π0.5 on the same board per the paper: 1420.8 ms (0.70 Hz) (not filed as a separate run: the baseline precision is not stated).

board: Jetson Orin Nano Engineering Reference Developer Kit Super (8 GB) · l4t: R39.2.1 · os: Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS · python: 3.12.3 · desktop: running

Inference cost only; not task success. 300 s run on synthetic 640x480 observations; 10 denoising steps; latency is runtime-only over a pre-materialized observation ring. Whole-board RAM in use 6.39 GB (unified memory, desktop running). Actions were gated against the stock policy (cosine >= 0.99999) before timing.

board: Jetson Orin Nano Engineering Reference Developer Kit Super (8 GB) · l4t: R39.2.1 · os: Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS · python: 3.12.3 · desktop: running

Inference cost only; not task success. 300 s run on synthetic 640x480 observations; 10 denoising steps; latency is runtime-only over a pre-materialized observation ring. Whole-board RAM in use 6.18 GB (unified memory, desktop running). Actions were gated against the stock policy (cosine >= 0.99999) before timing.