CanIEmbody

Does π0.5 run on OpenArm?

works
T1 · upstream documentedlast verified 2026-10-24 · 1d agoLeRobot 0.6.1

Capabilities

CapabilityStateNotesEvidence
Train / fine-tuneno verified evidence—
Real-robot inferenceworksDocumented on the bimanual OpenArm (--robot.type=bi_openarm_follower, three OpenCV cameras) with OpenArm Mini leaders, running the policy under lerobot-rollout --strategy.type=dagger with RTC inference (--inference.type=rtc); human interventions are recorded for fine-tuning.ev-lerobot-hil-openarm-default, ev-lerobot-hil-openarm-mode
Simulation inferenceno verified evidence—
Teleop + recordno verified evidence—

Evidence 2 sources; the cell shows the highest tier

  1. T1 · upstream documentedofficial-docssource 2026-08-03verified 2026-10-24 (1d ago)lerobot 0.6.1

    LeRobot's human-in-the-loop data collection guide runs trained policies on the bimanual OpenArm follower by default.

    “> The provided commands default to `bi_openarm_follower` + `bi_openarm_mini`.”
    https://github.com/huggingface/lerobot/blob/v0.6.1/docs/source/hil_data_collection.mdx
  2. T1 · upstream documentedofficial-docssource 2026-08-03verified 2026-10-24 (1d ago)lerobot 0.6.1

    The guide names this policy for the lerobot-rollout dagger command on bi_openarm_follower (RTC inference (--inference.type=rtc)).

    “**With RTC for large models (Pi0, Pi0.5, SmolVLA):**”
    https://github.com/huggingface/lerobot/blob/v0.6.1/docs/source/hil_data_collection.mdx

π0.5 inference speed by hardware robot-independent · inference cost only

ComputeRuntimePrecisionCamsp50 / p95 msInferencePlatformSource
RTX 4090llama.cppfp162 @224x22451.7 / —19.34 Hz—
conditions

board: NVIDIA RTX 4090 · ggml_cuda_f16_f32_out: 0 (README preset for RTX 4090)

Inference cost only; not task success. Full VLM + action-expert pass (ViT + LLM + 10-step action expert), LIBERO inputs (agent-view + wrist at 224x224). From the EagleVLA-Edge README RTX 4090 table (P50), PR #6 configuration. The README's naive π0.5 baseline on this GPU: 162.9 ms (not filed as a separate run: the baseline precision is not stated).

T3 · community reported
RTX 4090llama.cppfp162 @224x22458.5 / —17.09 Hz—
conditions

board: NVIDIA RTX 4090 · ggml_cuda_f16_f32_out: 0 (README preset for RTX 4090)

Inference cost only; not task success. Full VLM + action-expert pass (ViT + LLM + 10-step action expert), LIBERO inputs (agent-view + wrist at 224x224). From the EagleVLA-Edge README RTX 4090 table (P50). The README's naive π0.5 baseline on this GPU: 162.9 ms (not filed as a separate run: the baseline precision is not stated).

T3 · community reported
Jetson AGX Thor 128GBllama.cppfp162 @224x224132.8 / —7.53 Hz—
conditions

board: Jetson Thor (paper/README: "Jetson Thor")

Inference cost only; not task success. Full VLM + action-expert pass (ViT + LLM + 10-step action expert), LIBERO inputs (agent-view + wrist at 224x224). Later configuration from the EagleVLA-Edge README (PR #6); the README notes an accuracy caveat for the two-switch GEMM preset on Thor. Naive PyTorch π0.5 on the same board per the paper: 457.9 ms (2.18 Hz) (not filed as a separate run: the baseline precision is not stated).

T3 · community reported
Jetson AGX Thor 128GBllama.cppfp162 @224x224202.8 / —4.93 Hz—
conditions

board: Jetson Thor (paper/README: "Jetson Thor")

Inference cost only; not task success. Full VLM + action-expert pass (ViT + LLM + 10-step action expert), LIBERO inputs (agent-view + wrist at 224x224). Paper's 'control frequency' (10.25 Hz) is 1/reaction time with VLM-skipping scheduling; not executed actions/s. Board inferred to be the 128 GB T5000 class from the paper's 130 W max-power entry for Thor (T4000 is 40–70 W). Naive PyTorch π0.5 on the same board per the paper: 457.9 ms (2.18 Hz) (not filed as a separate run: the baseline precision is not stated).

T3 · community reported
Jetson AGX Orin 64GBllama.cppfp162 @224x224271.1 / —3.69 Hzpower_mode 50W (paper label "Orin-50W")
conditions

board: Jetson Orin, 'Orin-50W' power mode (AGX Orin 64GB inferred, see ev-orin-board-inferred)

Inference cost only; not task success. Full VLM + action-expert pass (ViT + LLM + 10-step action expert), LIBERO inputs (agent-view + wrist at 224x224). Later configuration from the EagleVLA-Edge README (time cache + cuBLASLt GEMM tuning, PR #6); not in the paper. Naive PyTorch π0.5 on the same board per the paper: 1420.8 ms (0.70 Hz) (not filed as a separate run: the baseline precision is not stated).

T3 · community reported
Jetson AGX Orin 64GBllama.cppfp162 @224x224374.5 / —2.67 Hzpower_mode 50W (paper label "Orin-50W")
conditions

board: Jetson Orin, 'Orin-50W' power mode (AGX Orin 64GB inferred, see ev-orin-board-inferred)

Inference cost only; not task success. Full VLM + action-expert pass (ViT + LLM + 10-step action expert), LIBERO inputs (agent-view + wrist at 224x224). Paper's 'control frequency' (6.93 Hz) is 1/reaction time with confidence-based scheduling that skips the VLM; it is not executed actions/s and is not recorded as control_rate_hz. Naive PyTorch π0.5 on the same board per the paper: 1420.8 ms (0.70 Hz) (not filed as a separate run: the baseline precision is not stated).

T3 · community reported
Jetson Orin Nano 8GB (Super)TensorRTfp162 @640x480438.47 / 438.932.28 Hzjetpack 7.2.1 · power_mode MAXN_SUPER, clocks pinned with jetson_clocks (GPU 1020 MHz, CPU 1728 MHz) · tensorrt 10.16.2.10
conditions

board: Jetson Orin Nano Engineering Reference Developer Kit Super (8 GB) · l4t: R39.2.1 · os: Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS · python: 3.12.3 · desktop: running

Inference cost only; not task success. 300 s run on synthetic 640x480 observations; 10 denoising steps; latency is runtime-only over a pre-materialized observation ring. Whole-board RAM in use 6.39 GB (unified memory, desktop running). Actions were gated against the stock policy (cosine >= 0.99999) before timing.

T3 · community reported
Jetson Orin Nano 8GB (Super)TensorRTfp163 @640x480643.39 / 644.921.55 Hzjetpack 7.2.1 · power_mode MAXN_SUPER, clocks pinned with jetson_clocks (GPU 1020 MHz, CPU 1728 MHz) · tensorrt 10.16.2.10
conditions

board: Jetson Orin Nano Engineering Reference Developer Kit Super (8 GB) · l4t: R39.2.1 · os: Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS · python: 3.12.3 · desktop: running

Inference cost only; not task success. 300 s run on synthetic 640x480 observations; 10 denoising steps; latency is runtime-only over a pre-materialized observation ring. Whole-board RAM in use 6.18 GB (unified memory, desktop running). Actions were gated against the stock policy (cosine >= 0.99999) before timing.

T3 · community reported

Embed this cell

Badge for READMEs and model cards. It always shows the current state.

π0.5 on OpenArm: works

[![π0.5 on OpenArm: works](https://caniembody.pages.dev/badge/openarm/pi05.svg)](https://caniembody.pages.dev/compat/openarm/pi05)
<iframe src="https://caniembody.pages.dev/embed/openarm/pi05" width="380" height="132" style="border:0" title="π0.5 on OpenArm | CanIEmbody"></iframe>

History

  1. 2026-10-25 fecccd1 Initial release: robot policy compatibility matrix · Danilo Znamerovszkij